Do JK Rowling and Matt Walsh Have More In Common Besides an Obsession With Kid Dicks?
Just where do the dovetailing interests of a billionaire author and a millionaire Jesus Nazi stop dovetailing, exactly?
“…a couple decades later, the woman who wrote those fantastic stories, decided that she needed to focus all her time and energy eradicating the world of transgender women. Which is not just a very Voldemort-y thing to do…”
Many years ago, just after I got married, I fell in love with the “Harry Potter” stories. My soon-to-be-wife and I watched the fourth film the night before we flew off to Vegas to get married. I had never seen one of the movies, or picked up one of the books before that night, but after seeing “Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire,” I was drawn in.Eventually, I devoured the entire book series, though at that point the seventh and final book hadn’t been published yet. I was so excited for “Deathly Hallows,” that in my over-exuberance I accidentally bought two copies, and we still have the sealed copy we got from Amazon somewhere. The books were some of the best storytelling I’d ever seen.
One of the themes that comes screaming off the pages at the reader is that of love and acceptance for everyone. The central villain in the series is an evil bastard who wants to purify the world of all non-magical folk, who he considers magical people superior to in every way…sound familiar?
No wonder members of the LTGBQIA+ community and their allies took a shine to the Harry Potter universe…it seemed so fundamentally inclusive.
“You have to be hyper-focused on kid dicks to be anti-trans. You really do.”
Then, a couple decades later, the woman who wrote those fantastic stories, decided that she needed to focus all her time and energy eradicating the world of transgender women. Which is not just a very Voldemort-y thing to do, it’s kind of creepy, really. When you break it all down, JK Rowling has grown a pretty unhealthy obsession with kids’ dicks.
You have to be hyper-focused on kid dicks to be anti-trans. You really do. Because at some point you’re going to start making the argument that we have to “protect the kids” from the trans agenda, whatever that is. Which means you’re going to fixate on the idea of gender confirmation surgeries, as if they are actually performed on 9 year old trans girls, and then you’re going to spew that toxic level of obsession about “gender mutilation” all the damn time.
Sure, you’re going to also bullshit your way into making dumb arguments that trans women somehow are invading on cis women’s spaces (which is a very deeply ironic level of patriarchal bullshit). But at the end of the day, the argument that will bring the Matt Walshes of the world to your table isn’t the coded, self-ingrained misogyny argument. It’s the kid dick argument.
Imagine a world in which a…progressive woman would team up with a deeply racist, homophobic, anti-woman garbage can lid in glasses …Actually, you don’t have to imagine it, because that’s the timeline we’re all living on.
So, soon, like Matt Walsh, you’ll make most of your life centered around “protecting the kids,” which means you’re going to talk and think an awful lot about…you guessed it. Kid dicks.
Imagine a world in which a presumably pretty progressive woman would team up with a deeply racist, homophobic, anti-woman garbage can lid in glasses and shitty suits like Walsh because they sure the job title of “transphobic propagandist.” Actually, you don’t have to imagine it, because that’s the timeline we’re all living on.
My question is this: are there are other things they have in common, Matt and JK?
Does JK also think the highest level of achievement a woman should get to make is shitting out a kid by the time she’s 16, like ol’ Matty does? Does she think that women should be robbed of their 19th Amendment right to vote, like Matt does? Just where do the dovetailing interests of a billionaire author and a millionaire Jesus Nazi stop dovetailing, exactly?
If you know the answer to those questions, feel free to drop me a line.